Skip to main content

Stakeholder Digital Governance Solutions

Let your contributions be seen,
Let's cooperate There are rules to follow.

Put roles, contributions, rights and governance rules into the company's own digital workbench. Combining governance design, incentive models, system implementation and daily operations allows long-term collaboration to have a basis, a process and people who are responsible.

Plan my governance plan See how a scene works

Start with a real collaboration problem and gradually establish a long-term governance mechanism.

W/ Your Business · Digital Governance Workbench Scheme diagram
SHARED VALUE. CLEAR RULES. Every piece of cooperation has a basis. Rule design → System configuration → Continuous operation
Employees Customer Channel Supplier Partners
  1. 01 Identity and role Who can participate and what can be seen
  2. 02 Contribution confirmation What counts as contribution and who confirms it
  3. 03 Equity allocation correspond to and how to apply it?
  4. 04 Governance participation How to put forward opinions and formulate decisions
  5. 05 Traceability & Review What happened and how to improve next step
Channel cooperation contribution Relevant business credentials · Agreed rules · Authorization review
To be confirmed

There is an entrance for participation, credentials for contribution, and records for governance.

Products + Services The interface and process are for illustration, please confirm according to the scope of cooperation.

Rule design + digital system + continuous operation

Modular solution · Confirm implementation scope according to needs

01 / FROM RELATIONSHIPS TO WORKING RULES

Value created together,
Rules need shared recognition.

Enterprises connect employees, customers, channels and partners. The larger the scale of collaboration, the more it is necessary to clearly explain the contribution identification, equity arrangement and participation process and implement them in daily operations.

Common collaboration issues How does the plan respond? What evidence is left behind?
01

Contributions are scattered and identification relies on personal memory

Align event and contribution definitions, then establish confirmation procedures

Contribution credentials and audit records
02

Rights and interests are ambiguous and cooperation expectations are difficult to align

Clearly state the applicable conditions, review responsibilities and types of rights and interests.

Equity rules and applicable status
03

Participation relies on temporary communication, and the process is difficult to trace

Organize proposals, feedback and authorization processes by role

Issues, participation and processing records
04

The system is written in documents, making it difficult to continue operations.

Configure rules into the system and establish review rhythm

Digital workbench and operation mechanism

02 / PRODUCT + PEOPLE + PRACTICE

Use the system to carry rules,
Use professional work to promote implementation.

The software provides accounts, contributions, rights, governance and backend capabilities. The personnel are responsible for relationship sorting, rule design, configuration implementation and operation, and forming a complete plan around the company's problems.

TECHNOLOGY PRODUCT Product Configuration

Enterprise Digital Governance Workbench

Use the relevant modules of the enterprise stakeholder wallet and governance platform as the technical carrier to confirm the applicable version and configuration range.

  1. 01
    Role account

    Organize participation entrances and visibility scope with identities, roles and authorizations.

  2. 02
    Contribution record

    Associate business events, related credentials, and confirmation processes.

  3. 03
    Equity allocation

    Set the equity type, conditions and status according to the confirmation rules.

  4. 04
    Governance participation

    Organize proposals, feedback and applicable engagement processes.

  5. 05
    Operation background

    Management authority, operation traces, objections and business reports.

Software boundaries, interfaces and data arrangements enter the implementation and acceptance list.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Personnel work
01

Governance design

Let’s first clarify the relationship and responsibilities.

Sort out stakeholders, role permissions, contribution recognition and discussion SOPs.

Role map/authority matrix/governance process
02

Incentive model

Let the rights and interests have rules that can be checked.

Define incentive sources, applicable conditions, contribution standards and review responsibilities.

Incentive model/Equity rules/Parameter description
03

Technical implementation

Turn the system into an operable process.

Confirm software scope, configure enterprise instances, jointly debug, test and hand over.

System Configuration/Test Records/Operation Manual
04

Ecological operation

Let governance enter ongoing operations.

Organize participation, manage issues, handle objections and review rule execution.

Operation rhythm / participation record / review report
Complete delivery: rule files + software configuration or access + implementation acceptance + operational arrangements

This page is an introduction to the modular solution; the specific software version, demonstrable capabilities, customized parts and delivery scope will be confirmed during cooperation and communication.

03 / FOLLOW ONE CONTRIBUTION

From a contribution record,
Understand how governance occurs.

Choose a collaboration scenario and follow five steps: what the system records, what people handle and how evidence is retained at each stage.

Connect team contributions to clear collaboration rules.

For project work, cross-department collaboration or long-term incentives. Define how contributions are recognized before configuring records, review and rights workflows.

Work flow diagram
A collaboration event Example

Cross-department project completes a delivery milestone

Contribution Credentials
Delivery list, acceptance records and participating roles
Confirm responsibility
Project Owner + Authorized Reviewer
Rights and Interests to be Applicable
Training, services or internal incentive rights configured according to confirmation rules

Contributions must be verified according to the agreed standards, and the application of rights and interests must be confirmed according to formal rules.

Stage 01 / Identity & Roles

Who can participate and what can be seen

Confirm the identities of employees, project leaders and collaborative teams, and divide submission, review and viewing permissions.

System responsibility Accounts, roles and permissions
Personnel responsibility Sorting out relationship and authorization boundaries
Plan according to this scenario

The above is a diagram of the workflow. Contribution records, membership or service interests do not automatically become equity, securities or dividend rights; the scope of governance participation and the effectiveness of decisions are determined by formal rules and authorizations.

04 / START SMALL, BUILD A WORKING SYSTEM

Let’s solve a problem first.
Then form a governance system.

Choose the starting point for cooperation according to the current situation of the enterprise. Rule design, software configuration or access, as well as human implementation and operation work, enter the same verifiable delivery scope.

01 First run through a governance process

Single scene pilot

Choose one priority group and one contribution-event type, confirming rules, system configuration and pilot operations together.

  • Role and Rule Design
  • Necessary software module configuration
  • Scenario acceptance and pilot review
Suitable for

Companies that want to start verification from specific questions

Start from this direction
02 Connect internal and external collaboration

Multi-role collaboration

Plan multi-role accounts, contribution standards and governance permissions around employees, channels, customers or partners.

  • Multiple roles and permissions model
  • Contribution, equity and participation allocation
  • Team handover and operation mechanism
Suitable for

A growing company with an existing team and cooperation network

Start from this direction
03 Let the rules iterate in operations

Continuous governance operations

Based on the confirmed software examples and rules, combine topic operations, participate in guidance and periodic review.

  • Current situation and configuration assessment
  • Issues and participation in operations
  • Rule review and expansion plan
Suitable for

Organizations that already have a system foundation and need to continue operations

Start from this direction

From rule consensus to actual use.

At each stage, there is clear confirmation and delivery.

  1. 01

    Goals and Blueprints

    Choose a scenario and review roles and business facts.

    Scenario blueprint and requirements list Enterprise confirms goals and responsible persons
  2. 02

    Rules and models

    Define contributions, rights, authorization and governance processes.

    Rule package and authority matrix Enterprise confirmation standards and rules
  3. 03

    Configuration & Acceptance

    Complete the software configuration or access and test the business process.

    System examples and acceptance records Check permissions, processes and data
  4. 04

    Operation and review

    Organize participation, handover team, and review implementation status.

    Operation mechanism and improvement list Confirm the division of labor between support and operations

CLEAR OWNERSHIP

System hosting process,
Responsibility is assigned to people.

Enterprise Team
Confirm business facts, contribution standards, equity rules, audit responsibilities and governance authorization.
Solution team
Complete the agreed rule sorting, software configuration, implementation handover and operation work.
Professional partner
Provide the relevant professional assessment or interface work when needed, defining separate scope and responsibilities.

05 / PLAN YOUR FIRST GOVERNANCE SCENARIO

With your collaboration questions,
Start a specific communication.

Choose the priority scenario, participants and collaboration stage to generate a summary. Use it to discuss demonstrations, rule design, implementation and pricing.

Drafts and downloadable request templates currently use Chinese source labels. Your input is kept as entered. Generating a draft does not send or submit it.

01 Which collaboration should we start with?
02 Which stakeholders need connecting?

Pre-select by scene and can be adjusted; please select at least one participating group.

03 What needs to be solved most currently?
04 Supplementary information to facilitate communication arrangements.

06 / QUESTIONS BEFORE WE START

Put the key issues into perspective.
Let me make it clear first.

Understand the boundaries of software, services and responsibilities, and then choose the scope of cooperation that suits the enterprise.

Direct email communication
How does this differ from enterprise wallet products?

The enterprise stakeholder wallet and governance platform provides technical capabilities such as accounts, contributions, rights, governance, and backend. L08 combines these software modules with governance design, incentive models, technology implementation and ecological operations to deliver them around the specific collaboration issues of the enterprise. The scope of cooperation should include both software configuration or integration, as well as clear personnel work.

Does a company have to go public or conduct an STO first?

You can start the evaluation from business scenarios such as employee contribution, channel cooperation, or customer membership, and first confirm the roles, rules, and software scope. Securities, payment, co-branded cards and STO are extensions that need to be evaluated separately. Whether to access them depends on the business foundation and the corresponding subject conditions.

Will contribution records automatically become equity, dividends or investment income?

The contribution record is used to record the facts of participation. The type of equity and applicable conditions need to be clearly defined separately. Membership, service and collaboration interests do not automatically become securities, equity or dividend rights; the effectiveness of governance participation should also be determined by the organization's formal rules and authorization.

What parts can be demonstrated or delivered now?

This page shows the modular solution and process diagram. During cooperation and communication, first check the specific software version, demonstrable modules, customized parts, deployment methods and implementation teams, and then determine the delivery scope, cost and acceptance criteria. The page representation does not represent completed software deployment or customer cases.

Can existing CRM, membership or business systems continue to be used?

You can provide existing systems and data fields during demand assessment to determine whether it is independent configuration, interface access, or process transformation. Access permissions, data sources, field mappings, external interfaces and migration scope need to be confirmed separately to form a clear implementation and acceptance list.

Who is responsible for contribution review, staking rules, and governance decisions?

The enterprise confirms the business rules, review responsibilities, authorization and decision effectiveness; the solution team is responsible for the agreed rule sorting, software configuration, implementation and operation work. The system records the process and performs operations within the scope of authorization. For matters that require the participation of professional institutions, the corresponding institutions and responsibilities will be clarified separately.

What if you only need a governance model or institutional document?

When delivering only models, regimes, or consultancy work, the scope should be determined by Governance Design Services. L08's complete solution includes the configuration, deployment or access and use of management software, along with necessary implementation and operation work. You can first explain the actual goals through email, and then choose the appropriate cooperation method.

How to determine the cost, period and data management scope?

Form a sub-project based on the number of roles, rule complexity, software modules, interfaces and operation cycles. Software usage, implementation, operations and third-party expenses are recognized separately. Data access, logs, export, backup, support and handover methods after termination of cooperation should be specified in the cooperation and acceptance documents.

BUILD LONG-TERM COLLABORATION

From co-creation,
Towards regular common growth.

First select a collaboration scenario and let governance enter daily operations.

Plan my governance plan Negotiate project cooperation
WISERUNION / STAKEHOLDER DIGITAL GOVERNANCEinfo@weitengfei.com

Continue reading · Solution

Implementation options for stakeholder digital governance solutions

Stakeholder digital governance solutions combine governance design, incentive models, software configuration and ecological operations. The goal is to connect roles, contribution recognition, equity rules and participation processes in the business.

Reading & Selection Guidance Choose governance design services when only systems and consulting results are required; discuss combination solutions when systems and personnel are required to be implemented together.

YOUR WISERUNION

Learn about free membership benefits

Registration and login are not yet open. This window only explains rights and plans, and does not create an account, save an email, or send an email.

Start with community communication Read the public core documents View learning direction
Preview the joining process (not yet open)
  1. Register and verify your email address after it is officially opened.
  2. Choose reading, learning and activities based on the actual open scope.
  3. Professional roles submit information and accept review according to independent rules.

Only the proposed steps are shown here. Expanding or reading this process does not indicate successful registration.